In case you hoped to truly study something about WWE patriarch Vince McMahon from Netflix’s six-part documentary Mr. McMahon there’s however one suggestion to supply: Don’t waste your time.
Regardless of opening with a taciturn McMahon sitting in a hoop and promising an exhaustive dive into his choices in wrestling, shortly the tone of Mr. McMahon modifications to change into far too much like each wrestling documentary that got here earlier than it. Gentle on info, skipping over key components of historical past, and guided largely by a cadre of previous and current WWE staff, all of whom appear extra involved with shielding the model than telling the story of Vince McMahon, which is woven into the material of the corporate — as a lot as individuals need to hold them separate.
This doesn’t imply McMahon is offered nicely. Actually, the takeaway from Mr. McMahon is that Vince is a singular-minded, power-hungry capitalist, whose 5 a long time in wrestling concerned shaping his complete life round what’s greatest for enterprise and rising WWE, on the expense of getting significant relationships together with his household.
The core situation is that none of that is new info. These are all identified portions with regards to McMahon, and that’s supremely disappointing contemplating that the creators of Mr. McMahon had a stage of entry to Vince no one has had earlier than. As an alternative the documentary collection is overwhelmingly a historical past of WWE from the Seventies to current, with a number of selection sound bytes sprinkled in from the person himself.
Parts are touched on, however given far too cursory consideration contemplating the breadth and stage of entry purported from the outset. These under-explored components of McMahon’s life embrace:
- Breaking off from the Nationwide Wrestling Alliance in 1982 and dismantling his competitors by breaking agreements inside wrestling, signing high expertise and destroying firms in his wake.
- Hulk Hogan’s position in busting union group contained in the WWE locker room and subsequent black-balling of Jesse Ventura, who was serving as a labor organizer.
- Unfair labor practices involving lack of well being care, branding wrestlers as “unbiased contractors” for tax functions, in addition to Vince’s cozy relationship with lawmakers to guard his firm.
- Casually justifying the dying of Owen Hart in 1999 as a “manufacturing defect,” regardless of there being ample proof that shortcuts and unsafe choices had been made within the lead-up to his premature dying.
- The ramifications of a 200-day-per-year WWE work schedule which unquestionably contributed to the early dying of wrestlers who felt compelled into residing on a regime of steroids and painkillers to permit them to wrestle each evening.
- An extended-standing historical past of inventive retribution in opposition to expertise that questioned McMahon or had office disputes.
All of those tales are touched on, however are given at most three-to-five minutes of airtime every, which is unbelievably shallow in a documentary collection which lasts over six hours of whole runtime.
It’s one factor to have the expectation that McMahon himself gained’t supply up a lot info of be aware on these matters, however interview topics all through the collection are seldom pressed into giving any perception into McMahon. Regardless of the negativity about Vince in Mr. McMahon it’s counteracted by the likes of Hulk Hogan, The Undertaker, John Cena, Steve Austin, The Rock, Cody Rhodes, and others — all of whom are prepared to extol McMahon’s virtues as a genius promoter, a “father determine,” and providing glowing reward of the person who made them millionaires.
No time is given to the large swath of wrestlers who previously labored for McMahon and who’ve been vital of him. It’s additionally notable that each wrestler who seems on Mr. McMahon is both at present employed by WWE, or on a “legends contract,” which pays former expertise in alternate for sustaining look rights. Sure, varied reporters and journalists make occasional appearances, however the presentation of those media members is usually as “outsiders,” who don’t actually perceive the enterprise, at which level it’s again to a WWE-sponsored voice to additional the story.
It’s inconceivable to really feel like this resolution was unintentional, particularly contemplating Netflix signed a 10-year, $5 billion take care of WWE to air Uncooked on Monday nights starting in January of 2025. The ever-present want to divorce McMahon’s actions from WWE, or wholly ignore firm involvement in key moments in historical past seems like an try to guard the model with whom Netflix has a deal.
Essentially the most damning critique of McMahon comes on the shut of the ultimate episode, which notes that interviews with Vince occurred earlier than the 2022 allegations about sexual misconduct, and notes that McMahon walked away. There are interviews with the reporters on the Wall Avenue Journal who broke the McMahon tales, however shockingly makes no try and interview Janel Grant, the lady on the heart of probably the most damning allegations in opposition to Vince McMahon and different former WWE staff. Grant’s lawyer maintains neither she, nor her client were contacted by the creators of Mr. McMahon, which is a mind-boggling resolution contemplating air time is given to those allegation.
We’re left with a multi-part documentary collection which says rather a lot, however little or no of which is exclusive or vital. Mr. McMahon is a squandered alternative to dive into the lifetime of one among skilled wrestling’s strongest males, and as an alternative leaves the viewer questioning what was left on the reducing room ground. In case you entered this collection figuring out nothing about Vince McMahon or WWE you’ll come away figuring out extra concerning the trade, however for anybody who hoped Mr. McMahon would lastly shine a lightweight on a few of wrestling’s most pivotal moments, the result’s sorely missing.
