Did Elon Musk Win the Election for Trump?

The election is over, and Donald Trump has won a second time period within the White Home. The following a number of months—and perhaps years—will probably be spent analyzing what truly tipped this election, however we at WIRED Politics Lab have a principle: Elon Musk. All through the election season, and particularly within the homestretch, Musk used his influence and platform to attempt to form the outcomes. In the present day, Leah sits down with Vittoria Elliott and Timothy Marchman to debate whether or not it labored.

Leah Feiger is @LeahFeiger. Vittoria Elliott is @telliotter. Tim Marchman is @timmarchman. Write to us at politicslab@WIRED.com. Remember to subscribe to the WIRED Politics Lab publication here.

Methods to Hear

You’ll be able to at all times hearken to this week’s podcast by the audio participant on this web page, however if you wish to subscribe without spending a dime to get each episode, this is how:

For those who’re on an iPhone or iPad, open the app known as Podcasts, or simply faucet this link. You may as well obtain an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts, and seek for WIRED Politics Lab. We’re on Spotify too.

Transcript

Notice: That is an automatic transcript, which can include errors.

Donald Trump [Archival audio]: Properly, I wish to thanks all very a lot. That is nice. These are our pals. We’ve got 1000’s of pals on this unimaginable motion.

Leah Feiger: Donald Trump has received a second time period within the White Home. He declared his victory within the early hours of Wednesday morning, from his marketing campaign headquarters in West Palm Seaside, Florida.

Donald Trump [Archival audio]: Frankly, this was, I imagine, the best political motion of all time. There’s by no means been something like this on this nation, and perhaps past.

Leah Feiger: The win was decisive, virtually shockingly so. Many people are nonetheless determining the large issue that pushed the nation onerous to the proper. Right here at WIRED, nevertheless, now we have a principle, and we have been reporting on him for some time: Elon Musk.

Donald Trump [Archival audio]: Who did you say?

[Archival audio]: Elon.

Donald Trump [Archival audio]: Oh, let me let you know. We’ve got a brand new star. A star is born, Elon.

Leah Feiger: That is WIRED Politics Lab, a present about how tech is altering politics. I am Leah Feiger, the senior politics editor at WIRED. As we mentioned on the present a number of weeks in the past, Elon jumped into the political dialog this cycle in an enormous manner, endorsing Trump, becoming a member of him at rallies, and placing some huge cash behind him, over 100 million {dollars}. Did his affect make the distinction for Trump, and what occurs now? Becoming a member of me at the moment to speak about all of this and extra is WIRED’s director of science, politics, and safety, Tim Marchman. Hey, Tim.

Tim Marchman: Hey, glad to be right here.

Leah Feiger: Glad you are right here too. Additionally becoming a member of, is WIRED senior reporter Vittoria Elliott. Hey, Tori.

Vittoria Elliott: Hey, Leah.

Leah Feiger: Fast check-in guys. How are you each doing?

Vittoria Elliott: I do not know what day it’s.

Tim Marchman: I actually need to only go to the park and browse a Victorian novel, or play shuffleboard or one thing.

Vittoria Elliott: That sounds nice. Truthfully, I want somebody would prescribe me some seaside time, like they used to.

Leah Feiger: As an alternative of seaside time and as an alternative of studying a Victorian novel within the park, we must always simply speak about Elon Musk. Proper? That additionally sounds extremely enjoyable to me.

Tim Marchman: I feel we’ll be speaking about Elon Musk for the subsequent 4 years. I, for one, cannot wait.

Leah Feiger: Let’s get into it. So, the large query to me, and I feel to most likely all of us, is did Elon Musk make this occur? Is he accountable, or not less than fairly accountable, very accountable, largely chargeable for this Trump victory? What do you suppose?

Vittoria Elliott: I do not suppose that he made it occur all his personal. I feel now we have seen quite a lot of demographic shifts within the teams that help or really feel aligned with the Republican Celebration, or not less than with Donald Trump. However I positively suppose there are very useful sectors of the inhabitants that Musk did encourage.

Leah Feiger: Tim, the place’s your head right here?

Tim Marchman: I might truly disagree a little bit bit with Tori, and I do not suppose there was most likely a measurable influence from what Musk did, as a result of the factor that Musk brings above all else is that this overwhelming consideration vortex. He’s fixed, he is ubiquitous, he’s continuous, he’s pushing 1,000 issues at anyone time, and he instructions consideration because the richest man on this planet. That can be true of Donald Trump. Donald Trump upends standard legal guidelines of electoral politics as a result of he’s a celeb of long-standing, and he is aware of manipulate the information cycle. So, whereas there was actually worth to what Musk did, and I would not say it was nugatory or something like that, when it comes to attributing particular demos or may a political scientist quantify how a lot he was definitely worth the polls? I feel that may be actually difficult to do, as a result of if he is a 100 out of 100 on the getting consideration and driving consideration to issues scale, so is Trump. You’ll be able to’t have greater than the utmost. So, that is the place I ponder if he actually had an impact. The place I might say his most vital influence most likely was in, I really feel prefer it’s turning into a cliche, however making a permission construction for different individuals, particularly different tech leaders, to return out in help of Trump. Which at the same time as not too long ago as in the summertime, it was pretty uncommon. There was quite a lot of hesitancy to actually come out full-throated as MAGA. I feel when Musk did, that allowed quite a lot of different individuals too.

Leah Feiger: He actually, actually got here out although. I imply, I do not know if I completely agree with you about, you possibly can’t go larger than the upper, and so forth. Sure, Trump had the viewers, he had the those that have been about to lie down at his ft. However Musk introduced in a completely new inhabitants. He has over 200 million followers on X. He runs and owns X. He has set these algorithms. We’re one thing solely totally different.

Vittoria Elliott: However I feel so as to add to that, I do not suppose it is only a permission construction for Tech CEOs to funnel their cash to Trump. Silicon Valley has had a libertarian, right-leaning pressure for a very very long time. However I feel additionally, there may need been individuals in that house of white males fan base that Musk actually does domesticate, that clearly is usually a bit extra various than that however that’s quite a lot of it, who might have once more felt Trump curious. However actually felt, I feel, extra energized for him as soon as Musk was onside. Speaking to voters in Pennsylvania, individuals actually have been like, “We’ve got the neatest man on this planet on our crew. We’ve got the inventor of all of those unimaginable issues.” I feel it additionally provided, whereas it could have lowered Musk within the estimation of among the individuals on the left, I feel in some ways Musk was in a position to make use of a little bit little bit of the clout that he had left to make it appear like Donald Trump was actually truly bringing the most effective minds onto his aspect.

Leah Feiger: So, clearly, Tori, you have been in Pennsylvania lots this month. You are there proper now. You watched all of this go down. You have been additionally on the first rally that Trump introduced Musk out to in Butler, Pennsylvania, in early October. Discuss to us particularly in regards to the individuals that you just have been chatting to. Was there anybody who was like, “Oh, I used to be bitter on Trump, however then Musk entered?” Or was it simply an extra? What are we speaking right here?

Vittoria Elliott: It was an extra. Nevertheless it was actually, I feel it was like individuals have been actually, actually stoked. I feel they felt that it added extra legitimacy to Trump, to have somebody who the media and different leaders have constructed up over the higher a part of virtually twenty years at this level, coming in and saying, “Trump is the proper chief and that is the best way ahead.” I feel my sense is there’s an actual frustration, particularly with youthful voters, in regards to the concept, the long run would not look as vivid as they have been promised it was going to be. One factor Musk does along with his speak of house journey and electrical vehicles, is make the long run sound thrilling, in a manner that I feel is interesting to individuals. So, that was positively the vibe that I received from individuals in Butler, that they have been excited that he was there, they have been enthusiastic about his concepts. Once more, that they felt it lent their candidate quite a lot of legitimacy to have somebody so sensible and so completed siding with him.

Leah Feiger: Let’s get into his precise pack that he dumped tens of millions and tens of millions of {dollars} into, America Pack. How large of an influence do you suppose that it had in swing states? What did they do with the cash, the adverts and movies they ran? I am curious for your entire ideas right here.

Tim Marchman: Properly, he donated not less than $118 million. There are extra monetary disclosures to return, so we’ll finally learn the way a lot in complete. So far as the Get Out to Vote operation that he had subcontracted to him, so far as I can inform the cash was mainly set on hearth. I do not suppose it did something apart from incur not less than one lawsuit. One can surmise that there are going to be extra coming from staff.

Leah Feiger: I imply, now we have to clearly speak about all of our WIRED reporting right here. Very pleased with our crew and our pretty freelancer, Jake Lahut. However over this final week, WIRED’s been reporting on circumstances that have been actually, actually excessive. Canvassers mentioned that they have been pushed round and seat-less and seatbelt-less, U-Haul followers, they weren’t paid on time, they have been pressured to work sick. It feels like such a multitude, and but right here we’re clearly with a Trump victory.

Tim Marchman: Yeah. However Elon would not miss the cash. He has $250 billion on paper, and it is onerous to get your head round what an inconsequential sum $100 plus million is relative to that. I stay in Philadelphia, so I used to be getting some mailers from America Pack. They have been fairly erratic and weirdly focused, and it would not appear to be it was a lot of a genius operation there both. However I do not suppose any of it a lot mattered someway. There’s educational analysis that actually casts doubt on the efficacy of door knocking and calling and sending individuals issues, that does not persuade individuals. What it does is perhaps join a marketing campaign with individuals who would not know vote. So, even when that cash did not get actually tangible outcomes upfront, that is nonetheless one factor. Nevertheless it goes again to that time about consideration. Elon Musk is personally pulling out $100 million {dollars} plus out of his pocket and placing it on the desk to help Donald Trump, sends an enormous message. In fact, in the end to him, what that most likely is is an funding in affect. Donald Trump is anyone, for those who give him $100 million {dollars}, he’ll have an excellent desk for you at Mar-a-Lago. He will take your telephone calls and he’ll open the doorways of the White Home to you. So, if we’re it within the slender sense of like, was this optimized environment friendly spending? Is that this what a money-ball marketing campaign would’ve accomplished? No, I feel he may have flushed it down the bathroom and gotten about as a lot out of it as he did. When it comes to it furthering his agenda and actually irrevocably tying him to Trump and to MAGA, and signaling that he was really all in, yeah, it did that. As a result of Trump may have misplaced, and if Trump had misplaced there presumably may have been penalties for Musk.

Leah Feiger: We might be having a distinct dialog proper now. I imply a lot of it did really feel like a stunt whereas it was taking place too. The million greenback per day stunt, that was such a information seize. That was a headline seize, that was an website positioning seize. Clearly his efforts have been tremendous, tremendous totally different from the Harris campaigns, in ways in which I’m certain that we’ll proceed unpacking over the weeks and months forward. However Tori, you created a timeline earlier this week that we revealed, that actually tracked from your complete final month of Elon Musk. What’s your takeaway from that? What can we glean from every little thing that he was doing, tweeting, sharing, donating, all the best way all the way down to Peanut the squirrel, what’s our month takeaway?

Vittoria Elliott: Oh, my God. You mentioned earlier this week and I used to be like, this week? That may’t be proper. You’ll be able to view quite a lot of what Musk was doing over the previous month as actually… Professional calculation round that, notably across the state of Pennsylvania, which was the swing state. So, displaying up on the Butler rally on October fifth, was such an enormous factor. Not solely as a result of it was western Pennsylvania, which is a key space of the state, but additionally as a result of that’s the place the primary assassination try in opposition to Donald Trump occurred. So, it was this large symbolic factor, and that is the place Musk debuted his in-person help for Trump. I feel that was terribly calculated. The truth that he dedicated to spend $45 million a month on the America Pack when he first endorsed Trump. He did not essentially spend that in these trenches or no matter, but it surely was about grabbing the headlines and once more, displaying how a lot he believed in it. I imply, it is a man who promotes meme cash on his platform. If you concentrate on it in that manner, he is excellent at this, driving brief bursts of consideration round stuff. I feel in the direction of the top of the election, equally with the $1 million giveaway, that is one thing that generates actual headlines day after day, persons are watching it. They’re questioning the place that individual goes to be. For the those that had the chance to get that million {dollars}, which was solely individuals in swing states, you are producing curiosity, you are producing consideration, you are signing the petition. Instantly he has the eye for this factor and that may inch into one thing else. I feel that is actually what we noticed. Even all the way down to the Peanut the squirrel factor. He spent the final weekend earlier than the election, we thought he could be out, we thought he could be stumping. As an alternative he was someplace inside, tweeting a couple of squirrel named Peanut that was web well-known. I feel on October thirtieth, it was confiscated from its house owners by animal management within the state of New York, and euthanized as a result of it additionally lived with a raccoon that had been adopted and the state mentioned it may presumably have rabies. Your complete weekend was simply bombarded with memes about Peanut. He made it political so rapidly. It was, “That is what occurs whenever you stay in a Democratic state. That is what they’re going to do. Why are they doing this and never going after Epstein?” That’s all shit-posting, however actually consideration grabbing.

Leah Feiger: No, I imply it was a play for the by line of the election. We talked about Elon Musk each single day, what he was contributing, what he was speaking about, what he was doing effectively, what he was doing poorly and his spheres of affect. Let’s take a fast break and we’ll be proper again with extra on Musk’s affect over the 2024 election outcomes, and the way he tapped into the Manosphere. Welcome again to WIRED Politics Lab. Let’s speak for a little bit bit about Musk’s different large supply of energy and affect, his on-line presence and the net platform that he owns. How did he use X over the last couple of months and what impact do we expect that it had?

Vittoria Elliott: He super-powered Trump speaking factors that have been at finest mis-informative, at worst disinformation, notably speaking factors round undocumented immigrants having the ability to vote, and Democrats wanting to offer undocumented immigrants citizenship to show all swing states blue.

Leah Feiger: No. He had conspiracy theories popping out of in all places, really hitting each single nice speaking level. He was sharing them with such urgency and with such velocity, and the best way that his algorithm works they have been simply popped up in my private feed continually.

Vittoria Elliott: On a regular basis. I imply, once more, I level out to actually everybody, even earlier than he bought the platform, Musk was a Twitter tremendous person. He was certainly one of, I feel, the ten most adopted individuals on the platform. So, even when the algorithm was not weighted in the direction of him, which there’s suspicion to imagine that it’s, he would nonetheless have unimaginable attain.

Tim Marchman: It is so overpowering. I consider it like a drone swarm assault, the place you simply ship out low-cost drones and also you ship out infinite portions of them and also you overwhelm air protection. Earlier than the break, we have been speaking about Peanut the squirrel. Have you learnt what Peanut the squirrel overwhelmed on X? The discharge of audio of Jeffrey Epstein describing Donald Trump as his finest pal of 10 years.

Vittoria Elliott: Wild.

Tim Marchman: Speaking about how Trump would sleep along with his pal’s wives. That is to not say that he did not have his personal ties to individuals like Invoice Clinton, as a result of he did. However simply by sheer quantity of nonsense, he is in a position to take a difficulty like that, personal it and turn into the protagonist of it. It is fascinating.

Vittoria Elliott: One of many Peanut memes was actually saying, “Why do Democrats have cash to euthanize a squirrel, however to not examine Epstein’s shopper checklist?” It’s simply, you possibly can’t make it up.

Leah Feiger: Full circle. Horrible. In fact, simultaneous to all of this, he is getting out the vote. He has over 200 million followers, like we mentioned, on X alone. I am going to always remember this, this truthfully modified what the election regarded like for me. It was in early October, and Musk was tweeting out, telling individuals to register to vote in Pennsylvania, and in Arizona. Then together with the hyperlink for voter registration. We have been analytics, and I feel it was one thing like 30 million individuals noticed these posts, and a million individuals clicked the hyperlinks. That’s so many individuals. Have you learnt what number of Harris canvassers and doorknockers there needed to be, or influencers, that the marketing campaign is subcontracting with a purpose to even type of compete with that? So, he has an onslaught of conspiracy theories and boosting completely bananas individuals on the platform that have been kicked off years in the past after which welcomed again on. And likewise getting out the vote. It was this trifecta of terribleness, and effectiveness.

Vittoria Elliott: Yeah. Properly, the Middle for Countering Digital Hate discovered that Musk’s tweets from the day he endorsed Donald Trump till October twenty fifth, reached over seven billion views. That to get that form of impression you would wish, in advert buys you would wish to pay $24 million to get that form of attain on X, for those who have been simply getting that attain by way of adverts. He’s this actually priceless communications asset.

Tim Marchman: I simply learn an oral historical past of the New York Put up. It is a fantastic guide. It is known as Paper of Wreckage. I might advocate it to anyone, it’s extremely entertaining. Close to the top of the guide somebody calculates that Rupert Murdoch most likely misplaced a billion {dollars}. Nominal, they figured about three billion, adjusted for inflation, on the New York Put up yearly, [inaudible 00:19:07]. Fox, on the similar time, was throwing off a billion {dollars} in income yearly. He made it up elsewhere in his empire. In quite a lot of methods, that is how I have been eager about Musk, is simply as a really conventional media baron who owns a megaphone and makes use of the megaphone.

Leah Feiger: The brand new Rupert Murdoch.

Tim Marchman: Yeah. He is a self-styled futurist, a Tony Stark, all that. However he is additionally a really acquainted determine, proper out of a kind of Victorian novels

Leah Feiger: That you simply desperately wish to be studying on-

Tim Marchman: Within the park studying.

Leah Feiger: … a park someplace. Sure, quickly.

Tim Marchman: We all know this type of determine. Simply anyone who owns a mass media outlet and makes use of it to advertise his pursuits. That’s precisely what you are describing there.

Vittoria Elliott: For a narrative that we revealed yesterday about how Musk has, by rolling again all of those protections at what was previously Twitter, he is a flown cowl for lots of different tech corporations which have additionally rolled again their protections, however not fairly as violently. One of many former Twitter workers I spoke to for the piece mentioned, “You realize, Musk is a great man basically. Not about every little thing, however about quite a lot of issues.” We’ve got an extended historical past on this nation of actually wealthy individuals proudly owning newspapers, like Jeff Bezos and the Washington Put up. However Musk realizes that social media is media and the higher play if you wish to management the dialog isn’t essentially to personal a paper, however to personal the platform.

Leah Feiger: Clearly we have all been speaking about this in our group Slacks and have been for a while, however the elephant within the room is the net bro tradition and the Manosphere, and the podcast bros which have actually formed this election. Musk is clearly a member of this cadre and has turn into certainly one of its leaders. Discuss to me about a few of these views and the way you guys suppose that this has impacted what we’re seeing right here proper now.

Vittoria Elliott: Oh, rattling. I’ve so many emotions. I feel it is notably telling that as an alternative of being out on the marketing campaign path on Monday, Musk spent virtually three hours in a studio in Texas with Joe Rogan. I feel that ought to point out to all of us how necessary somebody like Joe Rogan, who was hesitant along with his endorsement, however has positively been a pillar on the extra acceptable finish of the Manosphere, to consider how necessary he’s as a determine for that neighborhood. Younger males, younger disaffected males, aren’t precisely essentially the most dependable voting demographic. So, to me, truly ready till the final minute makes quite a lot of sense, as a result of I feel if that endorsement had come out in August, it could’ve been very easy for that to lose steam. However you are speaking a couple of group of individuals for whom that type of sustained political engagement isn’t actually their vibe. However to have it come out the evening earlier than the election, so it is truly a extra speedy alternative off of the again of that endorsement, makes quite a lot of sense to me. I feel after we’re speaking about this, we’re speaking in regards to the Manosphere. Among the views that Musk has parroted from its darker depths have been anti-diversity, fairness inclusion initiatives, this emphasis on childbearing and child-rearing. Musk has not less than 11 youngsters that we all know of, with not less than three totally different ladies. This very pro-natalist view, this view that folks ought to be having large households, that they need to be having youngsters, and implicit in that, that girls ought to be child-rearing, and that girls’s obligation is to make use of their physique for creating youngsters and for the perpetuating of the human species.

Tim Marchman: After I consider the Manosphere, I feel Andrew Tate, an accused sexual trafficker who overtly tells sexually pissed off younger males that girls’s our bodies are there for his or her use, and purports to offer them directions on sexually enslave them for their very own sexual satisfaction and to earn a living. All the pieces is downstream of that. From direct Tate imitators, to people who find themselves manner on the far different finish of the Manosphere and are roughly respectable, they’re nonetheless swimming in the identical water. We have all seen the statistics about how for a lot of massive, sophisticated social causes that we do not totally perceive but, younger males, quite a lot of them, they are not having intercourse, they are not going to school, they do not have pals. There is a large pool of those individuals who, disaffected virtually would not get at it, they’re minimize off from all this. They’re minimize off from a rounded life.

Leah Feiger: The podcast bros carry them again into the sunshine.

Tim Marchman: Carry them into this. The unifying thread right here is not only a generalized misogyny, however a view of ladies as instruments for use by and for males. While you pair that with a possibility to vote in opposition to a girl, to vote in opposition to a girl who Taylor Swift has supported, to vote in opposition to a girl who’s promising to revive entry to abortion, it actually does make quite a lot of sense. Like candidly, quite a lot of the explanation I believed Harris had a very good shot and I used to be leaning in the direction of pondering she was going to win, I used to be feeling comparatively certain throughout the confines of a 50/50 race that she had the marginal benefits. One of many large ones was simply, she was seeking to end up older ladies, very dependable voters. He was seeking to negate that benefit by getting crushed by much less in sure demographics, decreasing the marginal edge. A key a part of that was younger males, and I did not actually see it. It occurred. That is a political actuality that will probably be crucial going ahead.

Leah Feiger: Do we expect that these on-line males, and by extension Elon, then truly offered that essential turnout that tipped the election to Trump?

Tim Marchman: I would not go that far, but it surely’s a key a part of the coalition. I imply, the exit polls are nonetheless a little bit shaky. It is not like we’re wanting on the actually detailed ones that we’ll get when the voter recordsdata are launched. However, yeah. That appears to be a key a part of assembling a coalition for Trump. There was an enormous flip amongst Latino males. Younger males voted for Harris, but it surely was simply by a few factors. There was a shift there and there was a shift in some areas of as much as, I feel within the order of 25 factors in some swing states. It was actual.

Leah Feiger: It was huge.

Tim Marchman: Yeah. I do not suppose it is as neat and straightforward as saying that they offered the margin. You’ll be able to take a look at different teams and attribute it to them. However they have been an enormous a part of it. There is no doubt that the Manosphere and straight pandering to this very particular misogynistic ideology labored. I imply, and that is actually horrifying to consider.

Vittoria Elliott: Properly, and I feel after we’re speaking about Latino voters or certainly one of any background, quite a lot of cultures all through the world have patriarchy, a pressure of patriarchy, baked into their form of conservatism. I feel pulling on that may be a dependable approach to get males throughout demographics to really feel like there’s one thing in it for them. So, I positively agree that there was positively an emphasis on males voting. Scott Pressler, who based the Early Vote Motion Group, which was funded by Musk, moved to Pennsylvania and devoted most of this 12 months to turning out Pennsylvania. Was tweeting about, “Males keep in line.” Stephen Miller was additionally speaking about men-

Leah Feiger: Charlie Kirk.

Vittoria Elliott: … voting.

Leah Feiger: This was the factor.

Vittoria Elliott: Precisely.

Tim Marchman: With all of that mentioned, I do not wish to let guys my age off the hook. Trump’s core demo, the one which received him the election, was Gen X males. That is it.

Leah Feiger: 100%.

Tim Marchman: It is middle-aged white males. That is his core constituency.

Leah Feiger: To carry this again to Trump for a second, Trump liked this. Trump completely liked watching all of those influencers and podcast bros and Manosphere sorts, journey over themselves to ask him on and submit their clips on TikTok and X and make the rounds. It was in all places. It was so clearly a pleasant a part of this marketing campaign to him, and one which they clearly did very successfully. I am nonetheless actually enjoying out simply how in some methods grateful Trump is to Elon Musk for all of this elevation too. Elon watched the outcomes are available in with Trump. Have we ever seen something like this earlier than, when it comes to relationships in that manner, heading straight into the White Home?

Tim Marchman: I can not consider a very direct parallel. One of many issues that actually worries me about it’s Elon Musk is a significant protection contractor.

Leah Feiger: Yeah.

Tim Marchman: The phrase fascism has been thrown round lots, however at its most elementary, fascism is the merger of state and company energy. We now have a significant protection contractor who has an app that is on a whole lot of tens of millions of individuals’s telephones, who owns satellite tv for pc expertise, who owns rocketry expertise that is essential to the US, who owns vehicles which can be recording 24/7, tens of millions of them on the roads. He is anyone who appears tipped to be at most a shadow president, and not less than a key advisor within the White Home, may have quite a lot of say over protection, nationwide safety. That’s actually… You’ll be able to’t actually speak sufficient about how worrisome that’s.

Vittoria Elliott: I imply, additionally, can I simply say that I do not suppose we body Musk as a protection contractor sufficient, because-

Leah Feiger: I feel that is true.

Vittoria Elliott: … like SpaceX and Tesla, we’re like, he is this magical inventor. It is like, no. He is a protection contractor.

Tim Marchman: He is a welfare case. He is suckling on the general public teat.

Vittoria Elliott: He is a welfare king, and he is also a protection contractor. If a president was watching the outcomes are available in with the CEO of Raytheon, individuals will probably be dropping their shit.

Leah Feiger: Completely. Let’s take one other fast break, and after we come again, what occurs now? Welcome again to WIRED Politics Lab. We will skip Conspiracy of the Week this week. As an alternative, let’s spin this ahead a little bit bit and speak about what we are able to count on to see in 2025 and past. So, Tori and Tim, what occurs now for Elon Musk? What’s his anticipated return on funding right here?

Vittoria Elliott: Properly, to start out off, the New York Occasions did an attention-grabbing evaluation that confirmed that simply in federal contracts, we’re not even speaking about something past that, simply in contracts his corporations have gotten from the federal authorities, Elon Musk’s corporations have gotten 2.2 billion plus. So, I feel we’ll see an increasing number of cash being funneled in the direction of Elon’s corporations. Areas of the federal government that have been as soon as public are going to more and more be privatized, typically to his profit. I feel Blue Origin’s by no means going to see one other NASA contract. I feel notably along with his Authorities Effectivity Fee that he says he’ll head, I feel we’ll most likely see quite a lot of overlap between that and among the objectives of Mission 2025, of reducing authorities workers, reducing the lifetime workers who actually preserve the wheels turning between administrations, and putting in loyalists. I feel it is necessary to notice additionally, when Musk took over X, there was quite a lot of scrutiny over the truth that workers from his different corporations have been being sequestered in that acquisition to advise, to offer technical help. I might not be shocked if we see some bleeding over in that manner with authorities as effectively.

Leah Feiger: Tim, what do you suppose?

Tim Marchman: I feel we’ll see an aggressive lack of regulatory oversight over corporations which can be doing issues like placing computer systems in individuals’s brains, and creating massive quantities of house junk which can be making it tough to see the celebs. I additionally suppose that we’re going to see a gutting of the civil service, as a result of Musk is utilizing the rhetoric he used with Twitter and he has used with different corporations about bloated, wasteful authorities spending. Everyone knows this, however the authorities doesn’t truly spend all that a lot relative to its scale in a discretionary vogue. The federal government spends cash on protection, which Donald Trump isn’t going to chop. It spends cash on social safety and Medicare, and curiosity on the debt. All the pieces else is fairly trivial. There’s probably not an enormous alternative to chop out trillions of {dollars} in wasteful spending. What there’s might be going to be a possibility to take a look at one thing just like the Forestry Service and say, “Have a look at these loaded authorities bureaucrats sitting there watching timber.”

Leah Feiger: I imply, like goodbye Nationwide Parks query mark? There’s-

Tim Marchman: If you wish to speak about people who find themselves making pretty modest sums to do issues which can be necessary for society, I feel they need to be very anxious that their jobs are in danger. I feel it is a very sensible chance that that would utterly disrupt the power of the federal government to operate at its core, fundamental obligations, overseeing public lands, climate monitoring, you title it.

Leah Feiger: What authorities position do you suppose Musk is angling for and what does that imply for the way forward for tech and tech regulation?

Vittoria Elliott: I do not know that Musk is somebody who needs a selected position.

Leah Feiger: You do not see him sitting exterior the Oval Workplace, chief of employees?

Vittoria Elliott: No, I feel-

Leah Feiger: I imply, I do not both, to be clear.

Vittoria Elliott: I feel-

Leah Feiger: He needs affect, he needs energy.

Vittoria Elliott: He needs affect. He needs to be an advisor. That is as a result of, I do not suppose he would ever actually wish to, quote/unquote, work for Trump. Each he and Trump are individuals who conceive of themselves as alpha males, prime canine. They each are individuals who wish to seize consideration. I do not see both of them being keen to subjugate their egos for the opposite individual. So, I understand that he would most likely be extra like a floating advisor, doing what he is accomplished with quite a lot of his corporations. Which is like, he is like, “I will be an knowledgeable on house now. I will be an knowledgeable on vehicles now. I will be an knowledgeable on social media and free speech now.”

Tim Marchman: For all the explanations you simply outlined, because of this I feel the one factor I am certain of is that there’s going to be a nasty and dramatic fallout. There isn’t a manner two egos of this measurement can coexist. These are two actually thin-skinned, petty, catty males who wish to take to social media to say dangerous issues about individuals they do not like. So, if we’re going to get nothing else out of this dystopian and horrifying dynamic, we’re going to get the nastiest, meanest posts of all time from these two males about one another. I might say throughout the subsequent couple of years. We’ll look again in a few years and see if I used to be proper.

Leah Feiger: I am so excited for the fallout. For the election, I might’ve argued that Trump wanted Musk greater than Musk wanted Trump. Now we’re at maybe a task reversal scenario. There’s going to should be a little bit little bit of kowtowing, I might assume. What do you guys suppose?

Vittoria Elliott: I imply, I feel Musk is keen to demure to him in sure methods, it appears. However once more, I feel if Donald Trump believes that Elon Musk is ever going to be his worker, he is received one other factor coming.

Tim Marchman: Yeah. I feel the dynamic adjustments utterly as a result of the very fact is that Trump has made clear he’ll abuse the powers of the federal authorities at will, and the Supreme Courtroom, has made clear that nobody can do something about that. So, he has all of the leverage. If they’ve a falling out, if Musk would not wish to do one thing Trump would not need him to do, unexpectedly he can turn into a really zealous regulator of this fellow who has quite a lot of curiosity with the federal authorities, and desires pals in Washington, that may flip a dime very simply. So, within the larger strategic image, you surprise if Musk hasn’t simply delivered himself into the fingers of a person who has turned on each certainly one of his allies through the years in a really nasty vogue.

Leah Feiger: However perhaps Musk thinks he’ll be totally different.

Vittoria Elliott: “However he’ll be totally different with me.”

Leah Feiger: We will see. On the very least, I’m so glad to be figuring this all out and discussing it with the 2 of you, and the remainder of our pretty WIRED Politics crew. Shout out to the remainder of them for actually conserving us going this week. That is it for at the moment. Thanks a lot, Tori and Tim, for becoming a member of us.

Vittoria Elliott: Thanks, Leah.

Tim Marchman: Thanks for having me.

Leah Feiger: Thanks for listening to WIRED Politics Lab. For those who like what you heard at the moment, ensure to observe the present and provides us 5 stars. We even have a publication, which Makena Kelly writes every week. The hyperlink to the publication and the WIRED reporting we talked about at the moment are within the present notes. If you would like to get in contact with us with any questions, feedback, or present solutions, please, please write to us at politicslab@WIRED.com. That is politicslab@WIRED.com. We’re so excited to listen to from you. This episode was produced by Sheena Ozaki. Pran Bandi is our studio engineer. Will Purton combined this episode. Steven Valentino is our govt producer. Chris Bannon is international head of audio at Condé Nast, and I am your host, Leah Feiger. We’ll be again with a brand new episode subsequent week. Thanks for listening.